Share this :



Post on twitter:

 

MaRS is key in innovation strategy

 
Ontario Innovation Agenda20

Ontario Innovation Agenda

Yesterday morning, Minister of Research and Innovation John Wilkinson unveiled Ontario’s new innovation strategy in Ottawa – and in so doing outlined the specific, concrete steps the province is taking to secure a leading position in the global knowledge economy. MaRS is a key part of that plan.

The strategy is built around five key themes:

  • Accelerating commercialization by building on the province’s world-renowned research strength.
  • Focusing on key sectors where Ontario can achieve global leadership like advanced health technologies, biopharmaceuticals, digital media and information and communications technology.
  • Injecting commerce and entrepreneurship into education and skills training at all levels and for all ages.
  • Improving the overall business environment through progressive taxation polices and streamlined regulations.
  • Reconfiguring government as a catalyst and an enabler, in particular through new investment vehicles like the “Next Generation Jobs Fund.”

Unsurprisingly, MaRS is featured prominently throughout the strategy. Described as “one of North America’s largest and most concentrated convergence centres,” MaRS is praised for its ability to bring together under one roof researchers, entrepreneurs, investors and technology expertise – exactly the kind of assets which also anchor a broader, virtual network.

The strategy also emphasizes the importance of the Investment Accelerator Fund in providing early stage, seed capital to emerging technology companies. And in a reference close to my own heart, the report emphasizes the importance of social enterprises – and specifically mentions both SiG and a prospective Social Venture Capital Fund as key programs designed to revolutionize social enterprises across the province.

Notwithstanding the impressive array of commitments and initiatives, I was especially struck by the Ministry’s decision to define innovation in such a broad and inclusive fashion. By arguing that “innovation helps to achieve the greatest value from existing markets, create new companies and industries and address social problems,” the strategy adopts the kind of convergent perspective that sits at the core of MaRS. Very cool indeed…

Read more:

Related Blogs

Tags: , , ,

  • Mark

    The goals of the MaRS initiative are indeed laudable, however, as with everything else, it’s execution that matters. Close physical proximity of scientist, providers of capital, etc., at least on the surface, seems to be a key ingredient in “creating a culture of commercializationâ€?. Several regions in the US (in particular) can attest to the importance of this type of critical mass especially those anchored around top research universities. There is an important difference between those successful regions and the MaRS initiative, however. MaRS is attempting to artificially create the conditions (i.e., physical infrastructure, co-location of tenants and ancillary support services) that lead to increased commercialization activities specifically and innovation in general. In my view, “MaRSâ€? is, at best, a necessary but yet insufficient condition for stimulating commercialization success. Compare the history of other regions where innovation, entrepreneurship and commercialization are deeply rooted and one quickly notices the multiplicity, diversity of linkages, connectedness and depth of the talent and networks. Upon more considered analysis, one also notices the decentralized nature and dynamism of these networks. Can MaRS learn from these other regions and apply lessons appropriately? Yes, it can. But it may not be as central to the process as it believes itself.

  • http://blog.marsdd.com/Ross?aid=6 Ross

    Mark – interesting points all around, and certainly I didn’t mean to suggest that MaRS believes itself a central or indispensable part of commercialization in Ontario. That said, I’d challenge your comments about how “artificial” our process is. Certainly a community like Silicon Valley is far more complex, networked and decentralized than Toronto – but it’s also been a technology hot-bed ever since Hewlett and Packard were tinkering in their garage. Toronto is coming late to the party and looking to MaRS and other institutions to help jump-start the kind of connections that other communities have taken years if not decades to establish (connections that can only occur because the region already has the critical mass of university and hospital research talent, capital market depth and industry expertise to make give commercialization a fighting chance). Still, I couldn’t agree more with your point about learning the lessons of other regions – so if you have some more specific thoughts on this subject by all means drop me a line and we’ll chat!

Ross Wallace @ MaRS

Ross Wallace @ MaRS

Ross Wallace coordinates MaRS relations and collaboration with all levels of government, regional and international partners as well as other key stakeholders.

 
 
Get More From MaRS   MaRS NEWSLETTERS
Facebook Twitter Vimeo Flickr

MaRS Charitable Registration Number
876682717 RR0001

Please enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter