Share this :



Post on twitter:

 

Professors without patents: The unexpected entrepreneurs?

 
Girls in the lab

Do you ladies have a patent for that?

No patent?  No problem.

The results of a recent study challenge the standard notion that most businesses started by academics are based on patents (“Start-up model patently flawed” in Nature magazine, July 2010).

The study found that the majority of companies started by US academics are started without patents.  This is contrary to the generally accepted wisdom about how entrepreneurship occurs in a university, which usually goes something like this:  academics disclose their invention to universities, get it patented and then spin-out their company from the university.   This is actually only part of the entrepreneurial picture in universities — and a smaller part of the picture at that.

Chart from Nature Magazine

The study looked at 11, 572 professors at institutions across the US.  Of the 1948 respondents who had started a business, two-thirds (1266) had done it without a patent.  Generally, these entrepreneurs started manufacturing, consulting and other service-based businesses. It’s not surprising that many consulting and service businesses were created since they do not require patents, nor that many of these businesses were started by social scientists.  What is surprising is that technical academics such as biomedical and physical scientists started more businesses without patents than with them.  (See graph.)

Universities are generally less involved in supporting companies without patents, for a number of reasons including the expectation that these companies will provide a lower financial return, or the view that they need less help than technology-based inventions need to get off the ground. Interestingly, the survey found that there was no discernible difference in financial returns between the businesses started with and without patents.   That’s great news for those starting businesses without patents.

On the other hand, the study also found that those who started businesses without patents were more likely to fail. This confirms the value of patents – they are clearly a business tool and useful for many businesses.  But getting a patent can be a long process and the technology could change again by the time you get it, so don’t let waiting for a patent or thinking you need one stop you from launching your business.  Even if something isn’t patentable, you can still commercialize it.

Indeed, if we count on just using the numbers of patents emanating from the universities as a measure of their overall innovation, we are underestimating the overall entrepreneurial efforts of academics.  We are also potentially overlooking ways to support the majority of entrepreneurs at universities who might not fit the profile of the traditional patent-based spin-offs which receive support through technology-transfer offices and formal intellectual property systems.  Professors with patents are only the tip of the iceberg of university innovation.

Related Blogs

Tags: ,

  • http://twitter.com/JNGross J Nicholas Gross

    I don’t read the chart anything like you do.nnFrom this graph it appears that of roughly 650 entrepreneurs in technology fields (the top 3 categories) – almost 600 had patents, or almost 90%. Your data on “social sciences” – hardly an industry characterized by innovation – is distorting your overall figures. These may be “businesses” but they are not typically the target of VC funding.

  • http://twitter.com/JNGross J Nicholas Gross

    I don't read the chart anything like you do.From this graph it appears that of roughly 650 entrepreneurs in technology fields (the top 3 categories) – almost 600 had patents, or almost 90%. Your data on “social sciences” – hardly an industry characterized by innovation – is distorting your overall figures. These may be “businesses” but they are not typically the target of VC funding.

  • http://twitter.com/ttang_ Tim Tang

    And to cover those who have succeeded without patents, they still need to be “non-obvious, useful, and novel”.

  • http://twitter.com/ttang_ Tim Tang

    And to cover those who have succeeded without patents…it's because the free market determine their goods or services to be “non-obvious, useful, and novel”. Examples are Michelin star restaurants and high margin luxury goods with competitive imitators.

  • Anonymous

    The chart actually divides up the 1714 businesses that were started by discipline. So there may be roughly 650 entrepreneurs that started businesses in technology fields with patents, but there were another 650+ in technology fields that started businesses without patents. The pink bars (businesses started without patents) are longer in each discipline mentioned so the majority were started without patents, even if it’s a slim majority.nnI pointed out in my blog that the social sciences were no surprise of course, but what is a surprise is that more businesses were started without patents in physics and mathematics and biomedical sciences. So even ignoring the social sciences part of the graph, the pink bar (businesses without patents) is still longer for these more technical disciplines. And it appears to be just slightly longer for engineering as well. So even not considering the social sciences, the technical academics are starting more businesses without patents.

  • keridamen

    The chart actually divides up the 1714 businesses that were started by discipline. So there may be roughly 650 entrepreneurs that started businesses in technology fields with patents, but there were another 650+ in technology fields that started businesses without patents. The pink bars (businesses started without patents) are longer in each discipline mentioned so the majority were started without patents, even if it's a slim majority.I pointed out in my blog that the social sciences were no surprise of course, but what is a surprise is that more businesses were started without patents in physics and mathematics and biomedical sciences. So even ignoring the social sciences part of the graph, the pink bar (businesses without patents) is still longer for these more technical disciplines. And it appears to be just slightly longer for engineering as well. So even not considering the social sciences, the technical academics are starting more businesses without patents.

  • keridamen

    The chart actually divides up the 1714 businesses that were started by discipline. So there may be roughly 650 entrepreneurs that started businesses in technology fields with patents, but there were another 650+ in technology fields that started businesses without patents. The pink bars (businesses started without patents) are longer in each discipline mentioned so the majority were started without patents, even if it's a slim majority.I pointed out in my blog that the social sciences were no surprise of course, but what is a surprise is that more businesses were started without patents in physics and mathematics and biomedical sciences. So even ignoring the social sciences part of the graph, the pink bar (businesses without patents) is still longer for these more technical disciplines. And it appears to be just slightly longer for engineering as well. So even not considering the social sciences, the technical academics are starting more businesses without patents.

  • Anonymous

    Interesting but not earth shattering results.”By focusing on patent-based entrepreneurial activity, university administrators are ignoring the full potential for entrepreneurial activity present among their faculties.” R. Fini, N. Lactetera and S. Shane Res. Pol. doi:10.1016/ j.respol.2010.05.014;2010).

Keri Damen @ MaRS

Keri Damen @ MaRS

Keri builds and manages live and online education for entrepreneurs at MaRS. She’s worked in education and multimedia and for organizations dedicated to supporting entrepreneurship in Europe and Canada.

 
 
Get More From MaRS   MaRS NEWSLETTERS
Facebook Twitter Vimeo Flickr

MaRS Charitable Registration Number
876682717 RR0001

Please enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter