Match-making in open innovation

Posted by June @ MaRS, June 12th, 2009

Henry Chesbrough first coined the term “open innovation” in his book Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (2003).  He described a shift from a traditional closed model of innovation to an open model in which R&D-driven firms look outside their organization to solve internal research and development problems.  By working with external individuals or organizations, a firm can benefit from an increase in the number and diversity of potential solutions that would not have been possible in-house.

Life sciences businesses can now take advantage of this trend after the launch of the latest online marketplace for problems and solutions.

InnoCentive, spun-out from Eli Lilly in 2001, built the first global web community for open innovation.  The idea behind the web-based platform is to crowd-source solutions to challenging research problems.  The Open Innovation Marketplace connects companies and not-for-profit organizations (“Seekers”), with research problems (“Challenges”), to scientists and other experts (“Solvers”).  Monetary awards ranging from $5,000 to $1 million are posted for each challenge, paid out to Solvers if Seekers are satisfied with solutions.  Since 2001, the community has grown to over 175,000 Solvers.  More than 800 Challenges have been posted and more than $4 million awarded to Solvers.

Last week, Nature Publishing Group joined with Innocentive, launching the nature.com Open Innovation Pavilion as a platform for open innovation in the life sciences, physical sciences and clinical medicine.  By reaching out to Nature’s leading scientific community, the Open Innovation Pavilion aims to tap the resources of the world’s best scientists to solve global problems.  Other Innocentive Pavilions include Clean Tech and Renewable Energy, Global Health, and Developing Countries.

Are you a Seeker with a problem or a Solver with a potential solution? Check it out.

Find out more about open innovation:



Discussion

  • Open innovation itself is a revolution. But there is also a break through in pipleline wrt how services and technology for providing the platform for open innovation be delivered. Current model for open innovation is not open enough.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Popular Tags

Author: June Avila

Read Up

Professors without patents: The unexpected entrepreneurs? (4)
  • keridamen: The chart actually divides up the 1714 businesses that were started by discipline. So there may be roughly...
  • keridamen: The chart actually divides up the 1714 businesses that were started by discipline. So there may be roughly...
  • Tim Tang: And to cover those who have succeeded without patents…it's because the free market determine...
  • J Nicholas Gross: I don't read the chart anything like you do.From this graph it appears that of roughly 650...
New distribution channels for the new economy (2)
  • Katherine Roos: Great article. Community commerce is driving the entrepreneurial boom in Toronto!